I was upfront with Jacob from the start about why we didn’t usually offer “transformation” packages. The nature of time pressured personal training transformations lend themselves to rapid unsustainable weight loss and no real understanding of what happened, why it worked or where to go once the 12 weeks are up. It’s kind of like an expensive version of a 12 week juice diet
There is a difference between a method for weight loss and the mechanism of weight loss.
Fitness magazines, websites and the wider media place sugar consumption as one of the primary causes of weight gain, but what does the research tell us?
Some useful guidelines...
We are the same energy thrifty, industrious, hunter gatherers we have always been, but now we live in a different world, with different rules.
I tend to write a lot about the science of weight loss and debunking myths and false claims. However, this piece is merely my findings from working with clients, and the types of weight loss strategies that I see working on a daily basis.
Foodist (noun): a person who believes certain foods are superior to others based on outdated stereotypes. E.g: 'sugar is bad for you', 'avocados are good fats', 'pizza makes you fat'.
When it comes to weight loss, common advice is to swap out unhealthy snacks like chocolate and crisps for healthier alternatives like nuts and seeds. However, despite their health benefits, are nuts helping or hindering your weight loss?
At best out dated, and at worst deliberately misleading, there is plenty of misinformation within the fitness industry. To stand apart from this, many trainers and ‘internet gurus’ are now firmly in the camp of ‘evidence based’ or ‘scientifically based’ information, making their claims solely on the basis of peer-reviewed studies, RCT’s and meta-analysis, published in academic journals.
How then, even within the ‘scientific community’ are there still such polarising views when it comes to health, fitness and weight loss?